Two Ming written works were often quoted in discussions on the origin of
Ge ware. The earlier work《春风堂随笔》by Lu Tan (陆探) in essence mentioned
that during the Song period, there were two Zhang (章) surname brothers
who produced celadon wares in Chuzhou (处州), ie the ancient name for
Longquan. The younger brother (第) produced the white paste wares and
the elder brother (哥) produced the black paste crackled glaze wares. As
in Chinese Ge refers to elder brother, the ware he produced was termed
Ge Yao (哥窑). But a later written work《遵生八笺》by Gao Lian (高濂 ) published
in 1591 A.D during the reign of Wanli gave a different take on it. He
mentioned that there were much similarity between Guan and Ge ware
(官哥不分). The kilns that produced them were both located in Hangzhou
Pheonix mountain area. Guan ware was produced for the palace by a
government organisation Xiunei Si (修内司). Ge ware was produced by
private kiln operator.
More recently, a narration in the Yuan text《至正直记》by Kong Qi (孔齐) is
highlighted as offering the clue to solve the origin of the name Ge. In
the year 1363 A.D. , the author encountered someone who bought a censer
produced in a kiln known as Ge Ge Dong (哥哥洞) which was located in
Hangzhou . A friend Wang De Weng (王德翁) commented that it was very
similar and difficulty to distingush from Guan ware of the past. It is
suggested that Ge Yao (哥窑) was a subsequent abbreviation of Ge Ge Dong
(哥哥洞).
To conclude, Longquan Ge mentioned in Lu Tan 《春风堂随笔》is not the extant Ge
ware in the Palace collection. Guan and extant Ge ware are related and
shared the same root. Gao Lian who held the differing view turned out
to be on the right track afterall.
Written by : NK Koh (2 Feb 2021)