The Java Sea wreck was salvaged in 1996 by marine archaeologist Dr. Michael Flecker. An archaeological report published in 1997 dated the shipwreck’s cargo to the mid-13th century, near the end of the Southern Song dynasty. The vessel was likely traveling from Quanzhou, Fujian, to Tuban, Java, when it sank.
More than 7,500 artifacts—about half of the salvaged cargo—were donated to the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago in the late 1990s. In 2014, archaeologist Lisa Niziolek re-examined the trade ceramics. Based on insights from ceramic experts in China and Japan, she found that the ceramics resembled those from the 11th–12th centuries, rather than the mid-13th century. The Field Museum team subsequently re-evaluated the artifacts and concluded that the shipwreck actually dated to the second half of the 12th century.
The new dating of the Java Sea wreck aligns with Chinese archaeological findings. In the book 《中国沉船考古发现与研究》 (Archaeological Discoveries and Research on Chinese Shipwrecks), two key shipwrecks provide useful reference points:
![]() |
Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck with green glaze bowl with incised cyclical date ren wu (壬午载潘三郎造) , equivalent to 1162 A.D |
![]() |
Dehua jarlet from Nanhai 1 wreck with cyclical date gui mao, equivalent to 1183 A.D |
Many ceramics from the Java Sea wreck closely resemble those from Huaguang Jiao 1 and Nanhai 1. Key similarities include:
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Java Sea Wreck Fujian Minqing bowls with carved/combed decoration | ||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Comparable decorative style from Nanhai 1 and Java Sea Wreck (right) | ||
![]() |
Similar brown glaze Fujian Cizao kiln jars are found in Java Sea, Huaguang JIao 1 and Nanhai 1 wrecks |
Tongan/Nanan Green-Glazed Bowls
![]() |
![]() |
An example with carved/combed lotus decoration from the Java Sea Wreck (Photo Credit: Peter Schwarz) | |
![]() |
|
Comparable green glaze bowls with carved/combed lotus decoration from Java Sea and Huaguang Jiao 1 wrecks | |
![]() |
|
Green glaze bowls with sketchily carved/combed decoration from Java Sea Wreck | |
![]() |
|
Bowls with sketchily combed abstract decoration from Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Two types from Huauang Jiao 1 wreck that were also found in Java Sea wreck | |
![]() |
|
Bowls with similar designs are also found in Java Sea Wreck | |
![]() |
Brownish green jars from the Nanhai 1 wreck |
![]() |
Comparable stamped marks of those found in Qishi kiln and Java Sea wreck |
![]() |
||
Stamped reign marks Qian Dao (乾道)and Chun Xi (淳熙) on Guangdong Jars in Nanhai 1 wreck |
![]() |
![]() |
Octagonal qingbai ewer (left: Java Sea) and Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck | |
![]() |
|
Elongated ewer from a grave dated 1173 A.D. The Java wreck has an octagonal shaped example. Other than that, the other features such as the spout, hand and carved decoration are similar. |
![]() |
Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck qingbai wares. The two small qingbai vases on the left shared close similarity to those recovered from the Java Sea wreck. |
![]() |
Examples of small vases from the Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck. |
![]() |
This type of gourd-shaped small qingbai vases from the Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck were also found in the Java Sea wreck. A broken fragment similar to that circled in the photo is shown in the Java Sea Wreck Archaeological report. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Qingbai/white cover boxes from Java Sea wreck | |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Examples of cover boxes from
Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck |
Black-Glazed Temmoku Bowls
![]() |
Huaguang Jiao 1 wreck Fujian Temmoku bowls. Similar types found in Java Sea Wreck. |
The Java Sea wreck likely predates Nanhai 1, with evidence refining its date to 1162–1175 AD:
Taking these factors into account, the Java Sea wreck is now proposed to date between 1162 and 1175 AD.
![]() |
A Ganzhou brown-glazed pot with an
unglazed body from the Java Sea wreck closely resembles this one
found in a Qiandao-period (1171–1173 AD) grave
|
A scientific paper analyzing qingbai wares from the Java Sea wreck (circa 13th century) suggests that the cover boxes were likely produced at the Hua Jiashan kiln (建阳华家山窑) in northern Fujian’s Jianyang region and further south in Dehua. During the Southern Song Dynasty (1127–1279), Jianyang fell under the jurisdiction of Jianning Fu (建宁府), an administrative province established in 1162 CE that governed northern Fujian until the end of the Song dynasty. Notably, a cover box recovered from the Java Sea wreck bears an inscription referencing Jianning Fu on its outer base, aligning with the kiln’s operational period.
Archaeological evidence indicates that qingbai cover boxes were produced across southern Fujian, including Anxi, a key site whose products closely resemble those of Dehua.
![]() |
The outer base of this cover box mentioned Jianning Fu |
The Mandalika wreck (discovered off Java’s north coast, c. 11th–12th century) yielded a fragmented qingbai cover box with a molded 20-character inscription on its base:
“祖在建宁府 今在x溪县 戴x兴宝 窑工夫吴x”
(Translation: “Ancestors from Jianning Fu; now in X溪 County; Kiln artisan Wu [surname] of Xing Bao Kiln.”)
The partially eroded “X溪” (X Xi) is hypothesized to refer to Anxi County (安溪), a southern Fujian kiln center. This suggests that the potter’s family migrated from Jianning Fu (northern Fujian) to Anxi, highlighting the mobility of artisans during the Song period. Such migrations are corroborated by surviving genealogical records of Fujian potters. The inscription also identifies the kiln as Xing Bao (兴宝窑), providing rare direct evidence of workshop branding for export markets.
![]() |
Cover box from Mandalika wreck acquired by Mr Walter Kassela |
Ceramics with iron-black slip decoration under lead glaze (green or yellow) appear in the Java Sea and Philippines’ Breaker Shoal wrecks. These wares underwent a dual firing process: high-temperature bisque firing followed by low-temperature lead glaze application (~800°C). While most glazes have degraded, remnants confirm their original appearance.
Past attributions linked such wares to Fujian’s Cizao, Wuyi Shan (武夷山窑), or Nanping Chayang kilns. However, recent analysis of kiln rejects from Fuqing Shikeng kiln (福清窑) reveals nearly identical decorative techniques, suggesting Fuqing as another production source. Examples include:
Similar pieces found in Sumatra further underscore Fujian’s widespread ceramic trade networks.
![]() |
Nanhai 1 wreck Cizo kiln vase with floral decoration on iron black slip ground. Traces of lead green glaze is still discernible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Examples with incised/moulded decoration but degraded lead glaze from Java Sea Wreck |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Examples with degraded lead glaze from the Breaker Shoal wreck |
![]() |
Examples without the lead glaze found in Fujian Fuqing Shikeng kiln |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Some examples that were found in Indonesia Sumatra |
By the second half of the 12th century, Fujian trade ceramics dominated Southeast Asian markets. Evidence from shipwrecks such as Huaguang Jiao 1, Jepara, Java Sea, Breaker Shoal, and Nanhai 1 confirms this dominance. These wrecks carried large quantities of Fujian ceramics, which were more affordable than the higher-quality but more expensive Longquan and Jingdezhen wares.
During this period, the Southern Song court actively encouraged maritime trade to rebuild state finances after years of warfare. Emperor Gaozong’s 1137 AD edict emphasized trade over taxation, fueling a boom in ceramic production from Fujian kilns.
While 12th-century shipwrecks are well-documented, evidence from the 13th century remains scarce. The Pawikan Shoal (Investigator Shoal) wreck, discovered in the Philippines in the 1990s, is one of the few known shipwrecks from this period.
Artifacts from the Investigator wreck suggest an early 13th-century date, based on:
![]() |
|
Longquan kiln octagonal dish from Investigator wreck (Photo credit. Philippines National Museum) | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Chrysanthemum shaped bowls from Investigator wreck | |
![]() |
![]() |
Two Fujian kiln qingbai dishes with moulded decoration found in Sumatra Jambi. Similar dishes also salvaged from Investigator wreck. | |
![]() |
|
Fujian Cizao brown glaze kendi wtih moulded dragon decoration (Photo Credit: Gilbert Fournier) | |
Despite the scarcity of shipwreck data, 13th-century Longquan celadons, Dehua white wares, and Cizao brown wares are abundant in Southeast Asia. However, shipwreck evidence is crucial for a complete understanding of the cargo mix. Emerging trends suggest the growing dominance of Longquan, likely impacting Fujian green glaze production. The Batang Kumpeh River in Sumatra Jambi, yielding numerous 13th-century Longquan pieces, serves as a valuable reference for the types produced. (See: [Link to article: Late Northern Song/Early Yuan Lo (koh-antique.com)])
While Jingdezhen qingbai was a superior product, it appears in comparatively small numbers compared with Longquan. Its market dominance emerged only in the 14th century with Shufu white glaze and, later, blue and white porcelain. In the 13th century, Dehua white wares seem to have been a popular substitute, a trend noted by Marco Polo during his visit to Quanzhou in the late 13th century. Fujian's Putian kiln also produced white wares similar to Dehua, though generally of lesser quality. Interestingly, this kiln also continued producing significant quantities of green wares, some with Longquan-inspired carved lotus petals, as seen in the Karang Cina wreck (dating to the first quarter of the 14th century), which contained both Putian green wares and Longquan plates.
Cizao appears to have maintained its position as the primary supplier of brown and lead-glazed wares.
![]() |
![]() |
Putian green wares and some Longquan plates from Karang Cina wreck |
The Java Sea wreck provides valuable insight into Southern Song maritime trade and ceramic production. Its revised dating (1162–1175 AD) aligns with findings from Chinese shipwrecks such as Huaguang Jiao 1 and Nanhai 1. By the late 12th century, Fujian kilns dominated the export market, reflecting China’s strategic pivot toward maritime commerce.
As research continues, more 13th-century shipwrecks may emerge, helping fill the current gap in our understanding of this phase of ceramic trade.
References:
JAVA SEA WRECK ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT (pacificsearesources.com)
An 800-year-old label may rewrite the history of a Java Sea shipwreck | Ars Technica
www.koh-antique.com/nanhai/nanhaimain.html
Chronology of Longquan Wares of the Song and Yuan Period by Kamei Meitoku. Article published in the book "New Light on Chinese Yue and Longquan wares" edited by Chumei Ho
Written by : NK Koh (21 Apr 2023), updated: 15 Feb 2025.